Recognisibility
辨识度/Bian4 Shi2 Du4
n/a
CHEARS: False
EARS: False
CMT: False
EARS2 Encyclopedia: False
CHEARS:
EARS:
Some sounds we can recognise, others we can't. What does this mean for music that is made with sounds?
Good or Bad?
The extent to which a sound is recognisable can be either a useful tool or an annoying hinderance to music made of sounds. Some sounds, even if they are generated, will be recognisable to listeners as sounds linked to something in the world.
The Magical Power of Looping
Through his experiments with sound Schaeffer also recognised that you can change the way in which people think about sounds by looping them.
In this way, the sounds have moved from being concrete to abstract. From having a contextual link (a place and real world link), to being heard musically (as rhythms).
Hear the rest of the piece here: Abstracted Journeys.
Escaping the Source
Soundscape activity Going back to the sound source/sound type activity, were there any sounds at any locations where you were uncertain what they were? How did you describe them? Where did you place them or did you even simply set them aside? Return to one or more places you have visited (or a new one) and see whether there are any unidentifiable sounds and, if so, how do you best describe them? Are there any sounds where you think you know what they are, but are not completely certain? If so, how do you place such sounds: in one category, more than one or a category called 'unsure' and why?
EARS 2:
参看其它/See Also
术语翻译/Terms Translator
术语校对/Terms Proofreader
术语顾问/Consultant to terminology
参考文献/Bibliography
讲座/Lecture
评论/Comments
发表评论(预先注册)/Add comment on this term(members ONLY)